Back in 2014 during the Ebola scare, I published an article warning about how a global pandemic could be used by the elites as cover for the implementation of an economic collapse as well as martial law measures in western nations. My immediate concern was the way in which a viral outbreak could be created or exploited as a rationale for social control that the public would never accept under normal circumstances. And this could be any viral outbreak, not just Ebola. The point is the creation of an “invisible enemy” that the populace cannot quantify and defend itself against without constant government oversight.
I noted specifically how the government refused to apply travel restrictions in 2014 to nations where the outbreak had taken hold when they could have stopped the spread in its tracks. This is something that was done again in 2020 as the U.N.’s WHO and governments including our government in the U.S. refused to stop air travel from China, pretending as if it was not a hot zone and that the virus was nothing to worry about.
This attitude of nonchalance was quite deliberate. The establishment needs the pandemic to spread, from country to country first, because then they have a rationale for strict controls of pubic activities and movements. This is the end goal. They have no care whatsoever for public health or safety. The end game is to acquire power, not save lives.
In fact, at least in the beginning, they might prefer a higher death count as this would motivate the public to beg for more restrictions in the name of security. Authorities went from downplaying the outbreak and telling people not to bother with preparations like purchasing N95 masks, to full-blown crisis mode once the virus was entrenched here in the U.S. The question people will ask is was this due to incompetence or was it deliberate social engineering?
I believe it is entirely deliberate, and I will explain why in this article, but either way, governments have proven they cannot be trusted to handle the pandemic crisis, nor can they be trusted to protect the people and their freedoms.
At the same time, the pandemic itself is tightly intertwined with economic collapse. The two events feed off one another. The pandemic provides the perfect cover for the crash of the massive debt bubble central banks and international banks have created over the years. At the same time, economic chaos increases Third-World conditions within each country, which means poor nutrition and health care options that cause more sickness and more deaths from the virus. As I noted in 2014:
Who would question the event of an economic collapse in the wake of an Ebola (virus) soaked nightmare? Who would want to buy or sell? Who would want to come in contact with strangers to generate a transaction? Who would even leave their house? Ebola (viral) treatment in first world nations has advantages of finance and a cleaner overall health environment, but what if economic downturn happens simultaneously? America could experience Third-World status very quickly, and with it, all the unsanitary conditions that result in an exponential Ebola (pandemic) death rate.
…Amid even a moderate or controlled viral scenario, stocks and bonds will undoubtedly crash, a crash that was going to happen anyway. The international banks who created the mess get off blameless, while Ebola (viral outbreak), an act of nature, becomes the ultimate scapegoat for every disaster that follows.
As the double threat of financial collapse and viral pandemic accelerate, fear becomes widespread for those that never prepared ahead of time. And when people are afraid, they tend to sacrifice their freedoms to anyone that offers them a promise of safety, no matter how empty. For now, the public is being convinced to assume that lockdowns and restrictions are temporary, but this is a lie. The elites must maintain and increase restrictions with each passing month in order to prevent rebellion.
You see, the establishment is going for broke with this event, and because of this, there is the potential for them to face dire consequences. The mask is quickly coming off; the collectivists and globalists are exposing themselves and their political puppets in order to build a totalitarian system with extreme speed. The establishment must keep the pressure on for now because if the public is allowed to breathe for just a moment they might look around and wake up to the bigger agenda. The public has to beg for aid from the authorities; only then will the pressure be lifted for a short time. The public has to believe the control grid was their idea.
A new process of mass conditioning is about to be set in motion, using “waves” of panic and then waves of release and calm. After studying the behavioral traits and methods of narcissistic sociopaths (psychopaths) for many years, I can tell you this form of conditioning is very familiar. This is exactly what they always do, just on a global scale. They create an atmosphere of crisis to keep people around them unbalanced and on edge, then “relieve the pressure” intermittently so that those same people relax and their anger is deflated for a time. Then, the process starts all over again.
This conditioning traps the narcopath’s victims in a constant state of flux and uncertainty, and the moments of calm become a placebo which prevents their rebellion against him. He can then feed off his victims at his leisure, like a psychological vampire, and often these victims will see the narcopath as their only means of support. They have been convinced that all the threats are coming from the outside; they do not realize the source of the threats is the person standing right next to them.
The wave model of conditioning and control is starting to show up everywhere, and it is most blatant in the intended “solution” presented by establishment elites in response to the coronavirus outbreak. As Truthstream Media outlined in their excellent video ‘We Are Living In 12 Monkeys,’ MIT recently published a paper written by their globalist editor in chief Gideon Lichfield titled ‘We’re Not Going Back To Normal‘ which says quite brazenly how the elites intend to use this crisis to their advantage.
Lichfield lays out a kind of programming schedule for the population based on waves of viral infection outbreaks, waves of tight social restrictions, followed by waves of calm over the next 18 months. As Lichfield suggests:
To stop coronavirus we will need to radically change almost everything we do: how we work, exercise, socialize, shop, manage our health, educate our kids, take care of family members.
We all want things to go back to normal quickly. But what most of us have probably not yet realized — yet will soon — is that things won’t go back to normal after a few weeks, or even a few months. Some things never will.
He continues:
As long as someone in the world has the virus, breakouts can and will keep recurring without stringent controls to contain them. In a report yesterday researchers at Imperial College London proposed a way of doing this: impose more extreme social distancing measures every time admissions to intensive care units (ICUs) start to spike, and relax them each time admissions fall…
The only way for the public to escape this purgatory is for them to submit to a biometric data grid. They must volunteer (or be forced) to participate in 24/7 tracking through their cellphones and mass surveillance. In order to function in society, an individual must have the proper digital marker which tells the authorities that they as “clean” and devoid of infection.
This system achieves a number of things. Much like the social credit system China has been using for the past few years, the public is forced to constantly appease the hidden but all-seeing eye of the government. Everything they do is watched by algorithms. Any deviation might trigger scrutiny and a loss of simple freedoms to move around or participate in simple human interaction. Lichfield argues:
Ultimately, however, I predict that we’ll restore the ability to socialize safely by developing more sophisticated ways to identify who is a disease risk and who isn’t, and discriminating — legally — against those who are.
…one can imagine a world in which, to get on a flight, perhaps you’ll have to be signed up to a service that tracks your movements via your phone. The airline wouldn’t be able to see where you’d gone, but it would get an alert if you’d been close to known infected people or disease hot spots. There’d be similar requirements at the entrance to large venues, government buildings, or public transport hubs. There would be temperature scanners everywhere, and your workplace might demand you wear a monitor that tracks your temperature or other vital signs. Where nightclubs ask for proof of age, in future they might ask for proof of immunity — an identity card or some kind of digital verification via your phone, showing you’ve already recovered from or been vaccinated against the latest virus strains.
And there you have it. The social and biometric control grid that globalists have been hungry to set up for years now has the perfect catalyst — a viral pandemic which could cycle indefinitely; all that would be needed is to release a designer virus every year which renews public fear. The populace becomes increasingly dependent on the government for everything as their very survival depends on their ability to function within the new economy, and without a special mark granted by the government saying you are not an infection risk, you could be shunned from all trade and economy.
The MIT editor goes on to drive his point home in rather arrogant fashion:
We’ll adapt to and accept such measures, much as we’ve adapted to increasingly stringent airport security screenings in the wake of terrorist attacks. The intrusive surveillance will be considered a small price to pay for the basic freedom to be with other people.
Beyond the effort to turn “social distancing” into a new cultural norm enforced by law, there is another agenda being quietly instituted — the cashless society. More and more businesses are starting to refuse cash payments, claiming that paper cash spreads the virus. Only digital transactions are being accepted.
This may force the public to keep their money in banks despite the threat of a credit freeze or bank holiday. What if you pull cash out of your accounts but are not able to spend it anywhere? Eventually, they will ban debit and credit card transactions in stores as well, and replace them with a non-interactive payment model. This will probably be done through your cellphone in the beginning using a scanning app. In the end, they will use your biometric data for all money transactions.
This forces the public, yet again, to carry a cellphone on them at all times. The tracking network for the virus as well as the new payment transaction system makes this device indispensable. If you want to participate in society, you will have no choice but to be tracked and traced at all times.
Unless, of course, you build your own system of trade and interaction. The solution to medial tyranny and the cashless society is to not need the system at all for your own survival. This means people will have to build their own economies based on barter and local scrip. They will have to dump their cellphones and rely on other forms of communication such as radio or establish a cell system separate and independent from the establishment system. They will have to become producers and achieve more self-reliance. They will have to break free from the grid, and this has to start right now.
Of course, the establishment will claim that these independent people are a threat to everyone else simply by existing. They will claim that these people will “spread the virus.” They will perpetuate the lie of “herd immunity.” And eventually, they will try to stop these decoupled and localized communities from existing by force. At that point, we simply go to war with the elites, as we were always going to have to do anyway. The alternative is slavery in the name of the “greater good,” but there is no greater good without freedom, and there is no society without individuality. Pandemic be damned.
